Two major misconceptions about coaching writers
Talented developmental editors are often hesitant about adding coaching to their menu of services. Over my years of teaching, I’ve learned there are two main misconceptions that stop people.
First misconception about coaching writers
One common misconception editors have is thinking that coaching is a lengthy, ongoing process, like therapy, and they don’t necessarily feel confident in offering something like that (nor are they confident their clients could pay a reasonable fee for it). I mean, I’d be nervous with the idea of committing to a client for weekly meetings for the next six months.
But coaching isn’t therapy. You can coach a client for an hour or two and be done. If you’re helping an author solve a problem of limited scope, then that may be all the help they ever need from you. That doesn’t mean it isn’t worthwhile (for you or them).
As you build confidence, maybe you start offering ongoing coaching to support authors throughout the writing and revision process. But you don’t need to start where you end up. You just need to start somewhere.
Second main misconception when coaching writers
The second most common misconception is editors thinking that coaching is all about giving advice. They’re concerned that they don’t know enough to answer every writing question a client might have. I’ve been helping writers for over twenty years and I don’t know all the answers, so I understand this objection.
But coaching isn’t a transaction where you dispense wisdom as soon as a coin is inserted into your wallet. It’s a process where you and the author work together to discover the solutions.
In my admittedly loose definition of coaching, I include anything that helps a writer that isn’t actually a developmental edit. So this might be:
- helping them brainstorm ways to find time to write
- serving as an accountability partner as they draft or revise a ms
- reviewing disparate feedback from a variety of beta readers to help them gain clarity about what should be accomplished in the revision
- helping them understand the reasons for the rejection letters they’re getting from agents
- reviewing the first few chapters of a ms to help the author figure out why they’ve stalled
- helping them brainstorm solutions to problems they’ve already identified in their work
As you can see, some of these don’t require a lot of expertise in storytelling techniques so they can be a good place to start if you’d like to build up your confidence first. And of course there are dozens of possibilities I haven’t listed here.
The key is to start with something you feel fairly confident about offering and to build from there. Maybe you’re really good at using time effectively and can show some of your techniques to writers. Maybe you know all about technology tools that can help authors in their work. Maybe you are just a really good listener. Any of those (and many more) are excellent places to start.
Other Helpful Content
-
Setting problems: lack of concrete locations
Writers often use setting like a painted backdrop to their stories, rather than as an integral element of their storytelling. As developmental editors, we can help them make the setting come to life. If we think of Wuthering Heights, we think of the Yorkshire moors. When we think of Moby Dick, it’s a whaler on
-
How Setting Can Reflect Character
Authors have a tendency to prefer focusing on character and/or plot at the expense of setting/world-building. (The exception is some SFF writers, who focus on setting and forget about plot and character.) So as editors we will often call that out and say something like, “Add a little description here. Otherwise it’s like Miles and
-
How to Identify Developmental Problems
Noticing a developmental problem (the pacing is slow, the character is inconsistently portrayed) is only the first step in the editing process. The next step is to explain why it’s a problem for this manuscript. This second step is one that most editors skip at first (and many editors skip forever) but it’s crucial for
